The Behaviours Agency took part in a Channel 4 series looking at how AI could impact different industries. Here, Account Director Janey Baker explores the process, the results and what they've learned.
Earlier this month, Channel 4 reached out to us again, after already being part of their 'content creative' programme, to involve us in their new online artificial intelligence series: 'Can AI take our jobs?'
For our part in the series, AI (curated by Sophie, a C4 journalist with no AI knowledge and her AI specialist mentor) and we, The Behaviours Agency were both given the same brief: to create an FMCG brand in 48 hours that will be live tested on the streets of Manchester and a winner announced.
As a creative agency that specialises in behavioural science, creativity and human psychology but already utilises AI within creative processes, we eagerly jumped at the chance for our team of experienced AI-using humans to go head to head with AI to create an FMCG brand (once the initial ‘oh god what if we lose’ panic had subsided).
As the agency world knows, creating a brand name, logo, strapline, bottle label and ad concept would not normally take 48 hours but due to our agile approach, we were able to take on this challenge in a sprint-style abridged version of our normal process with decisions made on the hoof with all the key agency departments in one place at one time.
Here are some of the things we considered rapidly…
We know AI would be able to create a brand but we were less convinced AI would consider the retail environment and behaviour of shoppers to be able to create a brand that is truly shelf-worthy and distinctive. So, in order to maintain that competitive edge, we had to continually ask ourselves what would AI do or what would AI not do to stay one step ahead.
The fateful day arrived when we got to reveal to each other our finishing work…
Sophie's AI-generated brand poster featured an eye-catching image but fell short of understanding shopper preferences and featured a model donning six fingers, elongated toes, and a name better suited for suncream.
Our ad poster, whilst still striking, was praised for the fact it explained what the product was, the ingredients, the consistent message to the bottle label and a CTA… fundamentals to an ad campaign but something AI didn't consider.
It was now time to take it to the streets of Manchester to ask the public what they thought and which one they preferred. Argh.
Although this type of research and insight gathering is a really useful part of the process, it’s a minor part. What people say on the street and what they do at the point of purchase are usually very different. At the shelf, they’re thirsty, they’re in a hurry, they’re staring at a load of familiar brands and tastes, and our product has to appeal against that backdrop.
Of course, it is really exciting to have won because it gives weight to our process, our understanding of the audience, the market and the motivations of the buyer and also demonstrates our years of collective experience but we understand and will continue to embrace AI as just another string to our bow.For more on AI and our industry
The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and were submitted in accordance with the IPA terms and conditions regarding the uploading and contribution of content to the IPA newsletters, IPA website, or other IPA media, and should not be interpreted as representing the opinion of the IPA.